August 28, 2014
Authored and Edited by Brian R. Westley
A “selfie” of a crested black macaque with a wide, toothy grin can’t be copyrighted because an animal snapped the photo rather than a human, according to the U.S. Copyright Office.
A draft Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices released this month by the Copyright Office includes a revised section detailing the human authorship requirement. www.copyright.gov/comp3/. The Compendium provides examples in which the Copyright Office will not register works produced by nature, animals, or plants—as well as works purportedly created by “divine or supernatural beings.” They include “a photograph taken by a monkey,” “a mural painted by an elephant,” and “an application for a song naming the Holy Spirit as the author of the work.”
The macaque took its self-portrait in 2011 when wildlife photographer David Slater was traveling in Indonesia. According to various published reports, curious monkeys got ahold of one of his cameras and started snapping hundreds of photographs. The best image, which depicts a macaque staring directly into the camera, was published by The Guardian, the Huffington Post, and eventually Wikimedia Commons, a depository of free online images.
The photograph received a flurry of attention in recent weeks after Wikimedia refused Slater’s request to have it removed. Although Slater claimed he owned the photo, Wikipedia refused his request, noting that because the photo was taken by an animal, it had no human author and was thus not copyrightable.
[Source]
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Copyright © 2014 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Netflix Prevails in Copyright Infringement Suit Regarding Tiger King
May 14, 2026
Conference
2026 American Bar Association-Intellectual Property Law Section Annual Meeting
April 15-16, 2026
Washington, DC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.