直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • IP Health Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Lizzo Wins Big: Grammy and TTAB Victories

March 8, 2023

By Lisa Peller London

Edited by Margaret A. Esquenet

For music superstar Lizzo, 2023 began with a bang. Not only did Lizzo win Record of the Year at the 2023 Grammy Awards for her smash hit About Damn Time but her trademark holding company won a rare reversal from the TTAB, overcoming a “failure to function” refusal for her pending applications to register the phrase 100% THAT BITCH.

Lizzo LLC filed two applications seeking to register the phrase 100% THAT BITCH for apparel in Class 25, a mark inspired by a lyric in one of Lizzo’s most well-known songs, Truth Hurts. In refusing registration, the Examining Attorney argued that the phrase 100% THAT BITCH was “a commonplace term, message or expression widely used by a variety of sources that merely conveys an ordinary, familiar, well-recognized concept or sentiment,” and thus failed to function as a trademark, under Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1053, 1127.  

As with most “failure to function” refusals, this case turned on the evidence of record regarding third-party use of the expression 100% THAT BITCH. In support of refusal, the Examining Attorney relied upon website evidence submitted to the USPTO in a Letter of Protest, screenshots from additional websites selling apparel and other merchandise making primarily ornamental use of the phrase 100% THAT BITCH, and an urbandictionary.com entry.  The Examining Attorney also argued that “Lizzo did not originate the phrase 100% THAT BITCH but merely popularized it,” pointing to Lizzo’s acknowledgment that the phrase was a derivation of the popular phrase “that bitch” and Lizzo’s decision to give writing credit to the party who authored the Tweet that inspired the meme that inspired Lizzo to include the line “100% THAT BITCH” in her hit song.

Countering the Examining Attorney, Lizzo pointed to the USPTO’s registration of other musicians’ lyrics-inspired trademarks; her company’s enforcement efforts against third-party sellers of merchandise featuring her mark; and statements on the third-party websites that the Examining Attorney put into evidence discussing Lizzo and her song, to demonstrate that consumers associate 100% THAT BITCH with Lizzo and is not simply as a common expression.

The TTAB agreed with Lizzo, concluding that the Examining Attorney’s evidence did not demonstrate that the phrase 100% THAT BITCH was “used in general parlance or that it conveys a common social, political, patriotic, religious, or other informational message . . . .” Central to the TTAB’s decision was its finding that there was no evidence of widespread use of the phrase over a long period of time by many users before Lizzo popularized it.  That finding, coupled with Lizzo’s successful enforcement efforts and third-party use that specifically sought to associate goods bearing the phrase with Lizzo and her music, ultimately persuaded the TTAB to find that 100% THAT BITCH is not, in fact, a commonplace expression but instead is entitled to registration on the Principal Register.

The case is In re Lizzo LLC, 23 USPQ2d 139 (TTAB 2023) (precedential).

Tags

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Communications

Media

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Lisa Peller London
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4281
Email
Margaret_Esquenet
Margaret A. Esquenet
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4007
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Workshop

Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Patent Law

April 27, 2023

Cambridge

Seminar

Inadmissible Extension: Pitfalls in European and U.S. Proceedings

April 25, 2023

Munich

Webinar

No Laughing Matter: What the Intersection of Humor, the Lanham Act and the First Amendment Means for Brand Owners

April 25, 2023

Webinar

Conference

IAM Live: IP and Emerging Technology Europe 2023

April 19, 2023

London

Conference

Effective and Cost-Efficient Cooperation Between In-House & Outside Counsel in Licensing and Litigation

March 24, 2023

Taipei

Virtual Seminar

Obtaining and Defending Patents

March 22, 2023

Virtual

Panel Discussion

Women’s History Month Celebration - Reflections on 50 Years of Title IX in Athletics and Beyond

March 22, 2023

Hybrid

Webinar

Obtaining and Managing REMS Patents: What Patent Prosecutors Need to Know, USPTO and FDA Policies and Rules

March 21, 2023

Webinar

Conference

The National Forum on IP, Funding and Tech Strategies for Novel Therapeutic Modalities and Gene Therapies

March 21-22, 2023

Boston

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP