直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Let the Games Begin: USOC Eases Team USA Rule 40 Sponsorship Restrictions Ahead of Tokyo 2020 Olympics

October 11, 2019

Authored and Edited by Margaret A. Esquenet; Benjamin F. Tookey

In July 2020 the Games of the XXXII Olympiad will kick off in Tokyo, Japan.  But now, unlike in years past, Team USA athletes can thank their personal sponsors, and those sponsors can congratulate their athletes and run generic ads during the Olympics. That’s because on October 8, 2019, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) overhauled its guidance on Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter (Rule 40).

The long-standing International Olympic Committee (IOC) rationale for Rule 40 was that it prevented the over-commercialization of the Olympics while at the same time protecting official Olympic sponsors who, in exchange for their sponsorship, receive exclusive exposure rights during the Games. Under the prior iteration of Rule 40, “no competitor, coach, trainer, or official who participates in the Olympic Games may allow his person, name, picture, or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games” unless a waiver was granted. 

The rule applied during an advertising Blackout Period intended to prevent so-called “ambush” marketing from diminishing the value of official Olympic sponsorship and discouraging free-riding on the well-known nature of the Games. Specifically, the rule prohibited any advertising between nine days before and three days after the end of the Olympic Games by any non-sponsor, including the images, likenesses, and other endorsements of Olympic athletes. Even outside the Blackout Period, advertising by non-sponsors was required to focus on the athlete rather than the Olympic Game, and non-sponsors were expected to submit advertisements with biographical references to the endorsing athlete as an Olympian to the USOC for approval. 

In February 2019, the German Cartel Office (GCO), Germany’s national competition regulator, held that Rule 40’s restrictions on German athletes and their personal sponsors were impermissibly anticompetitive. The GCO’s decision allows German athletes and their sponsors (who are not official Olympic sponsors) to participate in more advertising opportunities and promotional activities ahead of and during the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. In response, the IOC amended Rule 40 to apply to all athletes. The new Rule state, “Competitors, team officials and other team personnel who participate in the Olympic Games may allow their person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games in accordance with the principles determined by the IOC Executive Board.” Essentially, National Olympic Committees, including the USOC, are now responsible for Rule 40’s interpretation, implementation, and enforcement.  In response to these developments, the USOC issued new Rule 40 guidance for Team USA athletes.

The key changes under the USOC’s guidance are: (1) increased opportunity for athletes to honor existing and engage new personal sponsors, (2) less restrictive timelines for athletes aligning with personal sponsors and creative execution, (3) ability for athletes to recognize personal sponsors during the Games, (4) ability for athletes to be recognized by personal sponsors during the Games, (5) a streamlined verification process with for sponsor responsibility and compliance, and (6) shared responsibility between athletes and personal sponsors through a yet-to-be public Personal Sponsor Commitment (PSC).

Although the terms of the PSC are not yet available, the USOC indicates that the PSC will be built into the process of obtaining Rule 40 permission. Specifically, athletes will be required to notify the USOC of their personal sponsors by registering online at any time before or during the Rule 40 period (July 14, 2020 through August 11, 2020) as long as it precedes any athlete marketing during the Games. Then, once registered, each personal sponsor identified by an athlete will receive a link to a clickthrough PSC that requires compliance with this guidance. USOC guidance regarding the PSC states that personal sponsors will be obligated to agree to “specific anti-ambush terms” and “standard protections for Olympic IP that apply at all times.” Sponsors will also be required to accepted certain remedies for failure to comply with the PSC, including (1) cancellation of the Rule 40 permission for all personal sponsors’ athletes, (2) inability to obtain Rule 40 permission for one or more future Games, (3) damages, and/or (4) injunctive relief.

Despite the loosening of Rule 40, restrictions remain: Team USA athletes will be limited to seven thank you messages during the Olympic Games (the content of which will be scrutinized), and personal sponsor messages congratulating athletes can’t use Olympic IP or imply any association, affiliation, connection, or sponsorship with Team USA or the Olympics. Nevertheless, the door to more advertising opportunities for Team USA athletes and their personal sponsors has been opened.  

Tags

Olympics, Rule 40

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Advertising

Related Industries

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation

Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. 
Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Workshop

SEP Global Workshop

March 18, 2026

Tokyo

Workshop

LES Japan Kanto Workshop

March 13, 2026

Tokyo

At the PTAB Blog

Made in the USA? USPTO Adds Manufacturing and Small-Business Factors to PTAB Discretion

March 13, 2026

Conference

Investival Showcase USA

March 10-11, 2026

Miami

Webinar

U.S. Export Control—A Shifting Landscape for AI, Semiconductor, and Other Techs – Asia audience

December 11, 2025

Webinar

Conference

IPBC Asia 2025

November 18-20, 2025

Tokyo

Articles

EPO Referral May Shift Patent Description Amendment Rules

November 4, 2025

Evolving U.S. Patent Strategies: AI Technological Innovation, Challenges in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sectors, NPE Litigation, and the Latest Trends in NPE Litigation and at the PTAB

October 30, 2025

Tokyo

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP