March 10, 2020
Authored and Edited by Brooke M. Wilner; Margaret A. Esquenet
“Influencers should be on notice,” Federal Trade Commissioner Noah J. Phillips tweeted on March 6, 2020. This tweet formed part of a thread discussing the FTC’s settlement with Teami, LLC, a tea and skincare product marketer charged with engaging in deceptive influencer advertising tactics.
In November 2019, the Commission published “Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers,” which laid out guidelines for influencer marketing. One guideline required influencers to place a disclosure of their relationship to a brand where it will be “hard to miss,” commenting that required disclosures are likely to be overlooked if placed “anywhere that requires a person to click MORE.”
The FTC’s complaint contended that influencers who posted about Teami’s products violated this guideline by placing brand disclosures at the end of a lengthy caption, requiring a viewer to click “MORE” to see the disclosure. And the health claims contained in the posts themselves—that Teami’s detox teas could lead to weight loss and treat conditions like migraines, clogged arteries, and even cancer—were unsupported by credible science, the complaint alleged.
By a unanimous vote, the FTC authorized a stipulated final order that imposed a $15.2 million judgment against Teami, an amount which represented the total sales of the challenged products. $14.2 million will be suspended upon the payment of $1 million based on Teami’s inability to pay the entire judgment. The order further requires that Teami’s advertisements include clear, conspicuous disclosures of material connection with its influencers.
In addition to the final order against Teami, the FTC also sent warning letters to ten influencers who posted about Teami’s products, including Adrienne Bailon, Jordin Sparks, and Cardi B. The warning letters stated that all material connections to a brand should be disclosed above the “MORE” button and should not be hidden among multiple hashtags.
The FTC has recently shown an increased focus on influencer advertising. This settlement and associated warning letters come on the heels of the FTC’s recent announcement regarding its plans to update the endorsement guidelines. We therefore expect more FTC action—and potentially more regulations—on the horizon.
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
June 10-12, 2024
San Francisco
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.