September 22, 2017
Authored and Edited by Pier D. DeRoo; Kara Specht; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
The Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that Uber could not compel arbitration in a pending litigation filed by Waymo. In its complaint, Waymo asserted patent and trade secret claims against Uber, alleging that Uber had obtained trade secrets from a Waymo ex-employee, Mr. Levandowski. Both of Waymo’s employment contracts with Mr. Levandowski contained a mandatory arbitration clause. In its complaint, Waymo referenced the contracts only to show that it had taken reasonable measures to safeguard its trade secrets.
Although it was not a party to the employment contracts, Uber sought to rely on their arbitration clauses to compel arbitration in the litigation against Waymo. Uber claimed that in view of Waymo’s reliance on the contracts, Waymo should be equitably estopped from avoiding their arbitration clauses. Applying California law, the Federal Circuit concluded that Uber had not proven satisfied either prong of the two-part test for equitable estoppel. First, Waymo did not assert any breach-of-contract claims, and therefore Waymo did not sufficiently rely on the terms of the contracts in asserting its claims against Uber. Second, Waymo did not assert that Uber acted in concert with the contract signatory, Mr. Levandowski, to violate the contracts.
Copyright © 2017 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Conference
Best Practices in Intellectual Property– A Decade of Dedication to IP Excellence
April 8-9, 2024
Tel Aviv
At the PTAB Blog
February 15, 2024
Ad Law Buzz Blog
November 28, 2023
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.