April 13, 2020
Authored and Edited by Regan J. Rundio; Samhitha Muralidhar Medatia; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In Keith Manufacturing Co. v. Butterfield, No. 2019-1136 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2020), the Federal Circuit held that stipulating to a case’s dismissal does not necessarily foreclose a party from seeking attorneys’ fees.
Keith Manufacturing Co. sued its former employee, Larry Butterfield, for patenting allegedly misappropriated trade secrets. Keith asserted state-law contract and tort claims and sought a declaratory judgment of noninfringement. The parties eventually resolved their dispute, filing a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. Then Butterfield moved for attorneys’ fees. The court denied the motion citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)’s requirement that the movant “specify a judgment” that justifies attorneys’ fees. The court reasoned that, because a stipulation is not appealable, it cannot be a judgment.
On appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s ruling, holding a Rule 54 “judgment” includes “more than just appealable orders.” Though “minimizing appellate litigation” motivates limiting the bases for both appeals and motions for attorneys’ fees, the Federal Circuit recognized that the limits are not identical. The difference is self-evident in Rule 54, which defines “judgment” as merely “includ[ing]” any appealable “order,” without being limited to them. The Court remanded, leaving to the district court the question of whether a self-executing stipulation constitutes a “judgment.”
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.