October 29, 2020
Authored and Edited by Elliott T. LaParne; Caitlin E. O'Connell; Katie W. McKnight; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In Corcamore, LLC v. SFM, LLC, No. 2019-1526 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s entrance of default judgment as a sanction against Corcamore.
SFM owns a registered trademark for SPROUTS for use in connection with grocery store services. Corcamore owned a registered trademark for SPROUT in connection with vending machine services. SFM filed a petition to cancel Corcamore’s registered SPROUT mark. Corcamore moved to dismiss SFM’s petition for lack of standing. The Board, relying on Empresa Cubano v. General Cigar, concluded that SFM established standing to bring suit because it sufficiently alleged a real interest and a reasonable belief of damage. At the close of fact discovery, SFM moved for judgment as a sanction for Corcamore’s litigation misconduct. The Board granted SFM’s motion and ordered that Corcamore’s registered mark be canceled.
The Federal Circuit acknowledged that the analytical framework set forth in Lexmark v. Static Control is the applicable standard for determining eligibility to bring a cancelation petition. Nevertheless, the Court explained that the Board reached the correct result because there is no meaningful, substantive difference between the Lexmark and Empresa analytical frameworks. The Court further held that the Board did not abuse its discretion by granting default judgment as a sanction for Corcamore’s misconduct.
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Webinar
May 9, 2024
Webinar
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.