April 14, 2020
Authored and Edited by Safiya Aguilar; Samhitha Muralidhar Medatia; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In Nike Inc. v. Adidas Inc, the Federal Circuit held that the Board may introduce independent grounds for unpatentability for claims raised on a motion to amend based on the prior art of record so long as the parties are provided notice and granted an opportunity to respond.
Following Nike I, the Board reconsidered Nike’s motion to amend. Citing art that was in the record but otherwise not relied upon to establish unpatentability, the Board issued a final determination finding Nike’s proposed substitute claims obvious over the art and denying Nike’s request for entry of the substitute claims.
On appeal, Nike argued that the Board’s final determination, specifically its failure to notify the parties of the new grounds for unpatentability, violated the APA’s notice requirement. The Federal Circuit agreed—although it was proper for the Board to rely on the art of record to develop its own theory of unpatentability, inclusion of the theory in its final determination deprived Nike of its right to notice and an opportunity to address the factual and legal underpinnings of the determination. The Court noted that the Board might have satisfied these requirements by notifying the parties of its intention to rely on the reference and requesting a supplemental brief or hearing directed to the reference’s merits.
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 19, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.