January 13, 2016
Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Shawn S. Chang, Jeff T. Watson
In Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Nos. 14-1437, -1485 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2016), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of JMOL of no invalidity, finding the court’s reconstruction of the claims altered the scope of the original construction.
The Federal Circuit explained: “[I]t is too late at the JMOL stage to argue for or adopt a new and more detailed interpretation of the claim language and test the jury verdict by that new and more detailed interpretation.” Slip op. at 16 (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Mustek Sys., Inc., 340 F.3d 1314, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2003)). According to the Court, the original construction did not provide for a certain component required by the district court’s new claim construction, and nothing in the portions of the specification that were identified for the jury mentioned that component.
The Court explained that a district court may “adjust constructions post-trial if the court merely elaborates on a meaning inherent in the previous construction” or makes “plain . . . what should have been obvious to the jury.” Given the parties did not agree whether the terms required the specific component, however, the Court found the inclusion of the component was not obvious to the jury, and the post-verdict reconstruction went beyond clarifying a meaning inherent in the construction or making plain what should have been obvious to the jury.
Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Webinar
Obviousness of Biologics Inventions: Strategies for Biologics Claims in the U.S., Europe, and China
May 28,2024
Webinar
Webinar
Building a Strong ADC Patent Portfolio – From Prosecution and Litigation Perspectives
May 15, 2024
Webinar
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March 2024
April 30, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.