直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Infringement Enforcement Letters Can Subject Sender to DJ Jurisdiction and Venue

December 19, 2018

Authored and Edited by Jonathan J. Fagan; Samhitha M. Medatia; Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., et al. v. Plano Encryption Technologies LLC, 2016-2700 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2018), the Court reversed and remanded the district court and held that infringement enforcement letters sufficed to establish personal jurisdiction, and therefore venue, in a declaratory judgment (DJ) action. Plano Encryption Technologies (PET) describes its “sole business is to enforce its intellectual property.” To that end, PET sent infringement enforcement letters to eleven Texas banks in the Northern District of Texas. PET’s registered address was in the Eastern District of Texas. After the banks’ indemnitor brought a DJ action in the Northern District, PET moved for—and was granted—dismissal for lack of venue. The district court reasoned that under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(d), which governs the residency of corporations in states with multiple districts like Texas, PET was not subject to venue in the Northern District because it was not subject to personal jurisdiction there.  

On appeal, the Court reversed and remanded, finding that personal jurisdiction, and therefore venue, would be reasonable and fair in the Northern District. The Court rejected PET’s argument that Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc., 148 F.3d 1355, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1998) or Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten Int’l Co., 552 F.3d 1324, 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2008) created a “special rule” against infringement enforcement letters establishing jurisdiction in a DJ action. Instead, the Court found that PET had purposefully directed its activities to Northern District businesses and failed to make a “compelling case” that the exercise of jurisdiction would be unreasonable and unfair.

Judge Stoll, joined by Judge Wallach, additionally wrote that the court should more directly address Red Wing Shoe and its progeny as contrary to Supreme Court precedent for suggesting that a comprehensive analysis of fairness factors is not required in cases involving infringement enforcement letters.

Tags

patent venue, personal jurisdiction, due process

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Contacts

Jonathan J. Fagan
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4119
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

Patent Litigation Europe 2027

January 18-20, 2027

Amsterdam

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 1, 2026

San Jose

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

2026 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference

November 2-4, 2026

Huntington Beach

Conference

Life Sciences Patent Network North America Fall 2026

November 2-3, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP