December 6, 2019
Authored and Edited by Brooke M. Wilner; Samhitha Muralidhar Medatia; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
The Federal Circuit warned against relying on conclusory expert testimony in TQ Delta, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc., Nos. 2018-1766, 2018-1767 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 22, 2019).
In response to TQ Delta’s patent infringement suit, Cisco filed two IPR petitions, challenging TQ Delta’s patents on obviousness grounds. The Board instituted both proceedings and found all the challenged claims obvious over the combination of two prior art patents. TQ Delta appealed.
In reversing the Board, the Federal Circuit first noted that the two prior art patents the Board relied on solved different problems than that solved by TQ Delta’s patents. In making its decision that it would be obvious to combine those patents, the Board relied exclusively on the testimony of Cisco’s expert. The Federal Circuit characterized the expert’s testimony as “brief, high-level explanation” untethered to any contemporaneous or supporting evidence. The Federal Circuit thus reversed the Board’s obviousness determinations under the substantial evidence standard, emphasizing that rejections on obviousness grounds could not rest on mere conclusory statements.
The Federal Circuit also observed that conclusory expert testimony is inadequate as substantial evidence in other areas of patent law, including enablement, written description, anticipation, and infringement.
combining references, Obviousness (35 USC § 103), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), patentability
Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 19, 2024
Articles
Injunctive Relief for Standard Essential Patents in International Jurisdictions
March/April 2024
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in February 2024
April 16, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.