June 09, 2015
Authored and Edited by Kelly S. Horn; Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Aaron Gleaton Clay
In Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc., No. 14-1205 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2015), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that the plaintiff did not suffer a “competitive injury” necessary to have standing to maintain a claim under 35 U.S.C. § 292(b).
The America Invents Act amended the false marking statute to require a “competitive injury” to bring a private right of action. The Court held that “a potential competitor may suffer competitive injury if it has attempted to enter the market” by showing an “(1) intent to enter the market with a reasonable possibility of success, and (2) an action to enter the market.”
Sukumar sought summary judgment on the issue of whether Nautilus fitness machines were falsely marked. The Court held that the plaintiff lacked both intent and action to enter the market and therefore was neither engaged in competition nor suffered competitive injury. Relying on the record, the Court found that Sukumar only intended to use the modified fitness machines in his company’s rehabilitation centers, but found no intent to enter the market with machines in direct competition with Nautilus. Further, Sukumar’s lack of a business plan, prototype design, employee hiring, acquisition of engineering knowledge, and investigation of development of manufacturing capacity, in the Court’s view, evidenced a lack of sufficient action taken to enter the market. As a result, Sukumar lacked standing to maintain the false marking action.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.