直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • IP Health Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Dietary Supplement Patent Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, Federal Circuit Affirms

March 17, 2023

By Caitlin E. O'Connell

Edited by Justin J. Hasford

In Chromadex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, Inc., No. 22-1116 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision granting Elysium’s motion for summary judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,197,807, which are generally directed to dietary supplements containing isolated nicotinamide riboside, are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

The Federal Circuit found that the isolated nicotinamide riboside in the claimed composition is neither structurally nor functionally different from its natural counterpart in milk, and thus held that the claims are directed to a patent-ineligible product of nature. For a more detailed analysis of this case, please see Finnegan’s Prosecution First blog.

 

Tags

claim drafting, subject matter eligibility

Related Practices

Enforcement and Litigation

Appeals

Portfolio and Market Strategy

Patent Prosecution

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Contacts

Caitlin E. O'Connell
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4004
Email
Justin_Hasford
Justin J. Hasford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4175
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IPBC Global 2023

June 12-14, 2023

San Diego

Conference

21st Advanced Summit on Life Sciences Patents

May 18-19, 2023

New York

Conference

Auto IP USA 2023

May 4, 2023

Detroit

Hybrid Conference

USPTO Design Day 2023

May 4, 2023

Alexandria

Conference

LESI Annual Conference

April 30, 2023 - May 2, 2023

Montreal

Workshop

Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Patent Law

April 27, 2023

Cambridge

Seminar

Inadmissible Extension: Pitfalls in European and U.S. Proceedings

April 25, 2023

Munich

Conference

2023 FCBA Global Series Spring Session

April 20, 2023

Washington

Conference

IPBC Korea 2023

April 20, 2023

Seoul

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP