• Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Careers
  • Tools
Finnegan
404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /esi/auxiliary-nav.html was not found on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Bringing Infringement Suit Waives Sovereign Immunity to Defenses

March 12, 2019

By Katherine T. Leonard

Edited by Kara A. Specht; Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. v. General Electric Company, No. 18-1284 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 26, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of GE’s motion to dismiss UFRF’s allegations of infringement.

In 2017, UFRF sued GE alleging infringement of the ‘251 patent, which described a method and system for ‘integrat[ing] physiologic data from at least one bedside machine.” GE filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the claims of the ‘251 patent were directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, which the district court granted.

On appeal, UFRF argued that the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear GE’s § 101 eligibility challenge because UFRF enjoyed sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. The Federal Circuit held that UFRF consented to federal court jurisdiction, thus waiving its Eleventh Amendment immunity, when it brought the infringement claim against GE. The Federal Circuit explained that the waiver of immunity extends not only to the cause of action but to any relevant defenses GE brought, including the §101 challenge.

After confirming subject matter jurisdiction on the §101 eligibility challenge, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that UFRF’s ‘251 patent was directed to an abstract idea.

Tags

subject matter jurisdiction, patent-eligible

Related Practices

Patent Litigation

Appeals

Contacts

Katherine_Leonard
Katherine T. Leonard
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6556
Email
Kara_Specht
Kara A. Specht
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6481
Email
Elizabeth_Ferrill
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, D.C.
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

Best Practices in Intellectual Property 2021

June 14-15, 2021

Tel Aviv

European IP Blog

Subject-Matter Eligibility at the EPO: Life Sciences

January 25, 2021

Prosecution First Blog

Patentee’s Success Story in a Hatch-Waxman Litigation Case

January 22, 2021

Webinar

Sanofi, Vanda, and GSK, a New Year Voyage through the Land of Induced Infringement

January 21, 2021

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

A New Application of an Abstract Idea Is Still Abstract: Court Affirms Dismissal Under § 101

January 21, 2021

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Disavowal of Infringement Case Eliminates Article III Standing for Appeal of IPR

January 13, 2021

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Finds Preamble Limiting When It Supplies the Claim’s Structure

January 12, 2021

Prosecution First Blog

Balancing Cost and Enforcement

January 11, 2021

Prosecution First Blog

How Two Recent Court Decisions Show Ownership Can Be Everything and Standing Must Be Taken Into Account

January 8, 2021

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2021 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP