November 27, 2018
Authored and Edited by Matthew J. Luneack; Kara Specht; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Assignor estoppel is an equitable defense that prevents an assignor of a patent from later challenging the patent’s validity. In Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 17-1525 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2018), the Federal Circuit held that assignor estoppel does not apply in IPR proceedings. Arista petitioned for IPR of a patent invented by a former Cisco employee that assigned his rights in the invention to Cisco and subsequently left Cisco to co-found Arista. The PTAB issued a final written decision rejecting Cisco’s argument that Arista’s petition should be denied based on assignor estoppel, pointing to earlier Board decisions explaining that 35 U.S.C. § 311(a) allows IPR petitions to be filed by any person who is not the patent owner.
On appeal, the Federal Circuit first considered whether this issue was reviewable under 35 U.S.C. § 314(d). The Federal Circuit determined that the issue of whether § 311(a) contemplates application of assignor estoppel was reviewable because it did not relate to the merits of Arista’s petition or the PTAB’s preliminary patentability determination. The Court found that the plain language of § 311(a) demonstrates that an assignor, who is no longer the owner of a patent, may file an IPR petition as to that patent. Thus, the Court concluded that § 311(a) unambiguously dictates that assignor estoppel has “no place” in IPR proceedings.
Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
June 10-12, 2024
San Francisco
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.