直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

A Piece of Federal Circuit History: Women’s History Month at the Federal Circuit: The First Woman-Authored Opinion

March 5, 2019

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill

On October 29, 1982, former Judge Helen W. Nies wrote the opinion for Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. 691 F.2d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 1982). Not only was Sanyo one of the first cases decided by the newly-created Federal Circuit, it was also the first Federal Circuit opinion authored by a woman. Judge Nies was the first woman to sit on the Federal Circuit after being reassigned from the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in October 1982. In Sanyo, the court affirmed a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) which dismissed Sanyo Watch Co.’s opposition because it failed to offer sufficient evidence to support its allegations of prior use and likelihood of confusion. Judge Nies explained that an opposer wishing to establish prior use should introduce its own trademark application into evidence; however, an application file, unlike a registration, does not establish prima facie rights to the opposed mark. An opposer possesses the burden of proof to advance the material allegations of the opposition, as well as the ultimate burden of persuasion.

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), Federal Circuit History

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email



Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 



DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP