直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

A Piece of Federal Circuit History: Women’s History Month at the Federal Circuit: The First Woman-Authored Opinion

March 5, 2019

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill

On October 29, 1982, former Judge Helen W. Nies wrote the opinion for Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. 691 F.2d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 1982). Not only was Sanyo one of the first cases decided by the newly-created Federal Circuit, it was also the first Federal Circuit opinion authored by a woman. Judge Nies was the first woman to sit on the Federal Circuit after being reassigned from the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in October 1982. In Sanyo, the court affirmed a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) which dismissed Sanyo Watch Co.’s opposition because it failed to offer sufficient evidence to support its allegations of prior use and likelihood of confusion. Judge Nies explained that an opposer wishing to establish prior use should introduce its own trademark application into evidence; however, an application file, unlike a registration, does not establish prima facie rights to the opposed mark. An opposer possesses the burden of proof to advance the material allegations of the opposition, as well as the ultimate burden of persuasion.

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), Federal Circuit History

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email



Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 



DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 10, 2026

San Jose

Charitable

2026 ALYN Hospital Wheels of Love Ride

November 8-12, 2026

Northern District

Conference

AIChE Annual Meeting 2026

November 8-12, 2026

Minneapolis

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP