直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

A Piece of Federal Circuit History: It’s a Little Cheesy

May 28, 2019

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill

One of the most cited decisions issued by the Federal Circuit is University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Co., Inc., 703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983). In that case, the University of Notre Dame appealed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s dismissal of the university’s opposition to the food importer’s application for registration for the wordmark NOTRE DAME and a design mark for use with imported cheeses. In its decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s holding that despite the public’s ability to recall the famous mark, the differences between the goods and services being offered by the university and food importer were sufficient to preclude a likelihood of confusion, there was no false association being made by the food importer with the university, and the university was not entitled to preclude the food importer from registering its trademark for cheeses. Since this opinion was published, it has been cited nearly 3,000 times for issues related to trademark registration preclusion.

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), Federal Circuit History

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email


Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 



DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP