直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

A Review of the Most Popular Posts From 2018

8 January 2019

Authored and Edited by Sanam Habib

Having said goodbye to 2018 a week ago, we thought we would take a look back at the most popular posts from the year. From posting about changes in Government fees, to the impact of Brexit on IP, to new referrals to the Enlarged Board of Appeal; the following five posts were the most popular amongst our readers in 2018:

1. Patentability of Diagnostic Methods in Europe

This post from January 2018 was our most popular post of the year. By covering the hot topic of patentability of diagnostic methods in Europe, and discussing key cases within the field, this post became a hit amongst our readers.

2. Brexit and the Future of Intellectual Property in the UK

Brexit is currently one of the most talked about topics. This post reported on the publication of the policy paper (‘’White Paper’’) and became one of the most popular posts amongst our readers.

3. Compliance Period for GB Patent Applications

The compliance period is a fixed timescale which only applies for UK patent applications. Being a relevant topic within UK patent law and having been posted close to the UK qualifying examinations (you are welcome, trainees), this post was one of the most popular reads in 2018.

4. Slowing Things Down at the EPO

 With the EPO actively trying to increase the efficiency and timeliness of prosecution of European patents, this May 2018 post was a hit amongst our readers in 2018.

Since May 2018, the EPO has launched an online user consultation amongst stakeholders. The consultation will remain open until 11 January 2019, and so you will likely hear more from us on this topic in the near future.

5. G1/18 - A New Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Another popular read of 2018 was the post about G1/18, a referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal. The pending referral aims to answer the question of what happens to an appeal if the appeal fee is paid after the expiry of the two-month time limit set under Article 108 EPC. You will likely hear more from us once an update is posted by the EPO.

Tags

European Patent Office (EPO), United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), 2018 Top Insights

Copyright © 2019 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP