April 3, 2026
Authored and Edited by Forrest A. Jones; *Xu Wang
On April 1, 2026, the Patent Office issued an Official Gazette Notice announcing a new procedure that permits patent owners to submit a limited paper regarding whether an EPR request raises a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) before the Patent Office makes its determination to grant or deny the request under 35 U.S.C. § 303(a).
Under 35 U.S.C. § 303(a), the Patent Office must determine within three months whether a request of EPR raised an SNQ affecting any claim of the patent. This has been done based on the request alone, with the Patent Owner’s statement under 37 CFR 1.530 being allowed only after this determination has taken place.
Starting with requests for reexamination filed on or after April 5, 2026, patent owners may submit a pre-order paper providing information useful to make the SNQ determination without filing a petition or paying a fee. The pre-order paper is subject to several requirements:
The pre-order paper should be entitled “Patent owner pre-order paper providing information useful in making the SNQ determination.”
A third-party requester ordinarily may not file a response to the patent owner’s pre-order paper, except in limited circumstances, such as to address alleged misrepresentations of fact or law or other improper arguments that materially impede the SNQ determination. If the requester believes an exception applies, it may file a responsive paper subject to the following requirements:
The Notice explains that this process is being introduced in response to recent increased volume of EPR requests. In implementing this process, the Patent Office is waiving the requirements of 37 CFR 1.530(a) and the second sentence of 1.540, to allow consideration of this new paper. The Notice states that it may consider revisions to the rules if the pre-order papers prove helpful.
*Xu Wang is a law clerk at Finnegan
Copyright © 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York
September 28-29, 2026
New York
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.