直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

USPTO Introduces Patent Owner Pre-Order SNQ Briefing in EPR

April 3, 2026

Authored and Edited by Forrest A. Jones; *Xu Wang

On April 1, 2026, the Patent Office issued an Official Gazette Notice announcing a new procedure that permits patent owners to submit a limited paper regarding whether an EPR request raises a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) before the Patent Office makes its determination to grant or deny the request under 35 U.S.C. § 303(a).

Under 35 U.S.C. § 303(a), the Patent Office must determine within three months whether a request of EPR raised an SNQ affecting any claim of the patent. This has been done based on the request alone, with the Patent Owner’s statement under 37 CFR 1.530 being allowed only after this determination has taken place.

Starting with requests for reexamination filed on or after April 5, 2026, patent owners may submit a pre-order paper providing information useful to make the SNQ determination without filing a petition or paying a fee. The pre-order paper is subject to several requirements:

  • The pre-order paper should be entitled “Patent owner pre-order paper providing information useful in making the SNQ determination.”

  • The pre-order paper is limited to 30 pages and must comply with the formal requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.52. Patent owners may support the paper with a declaration, which does not count toward the page limit. But the Patent Office will rely on arguments made in the paper itself, and incorporation by reference is not permitted.
  • The subject of the pre-order paper is limited to “arguments or facts to support patent owner’s position that, despite the argued teaching(s) in the request, the Office should maintain the decision of patentability made during examination.”
  • The pre-order paper should not address matters not raised in the request and specifically should not address why the USPTO should exercise discretion under 35 U.S.C. 325(d), which is taken up after the SNQ determination.
  • The pre-order paper is also not intended to replace the patent owner’s statement under 37 CFR 1.530, and as such challenges to a finding that an alleged teaching is new should not be raised in this paper.
  • The pre-order paper must be filed no later than 30 days after the service of the EPR petition. This deadline is not extendable.
  • The pre-order paper must be served on any third party requester in the manner provided by 37 C.F.R. § 1.248.

A third-party requester ordinarily may not file a response to the patent owner’s pre-order paper, except in limited circumstances, such as to address alleged misrepresentations of fact or law or other improper arguments that materially impede the SNQ determination. If the requester believes an exception applies, it may file a responsive paper subject to the following requirements:

  • The responsive paper should be accompanied by a petition and fee under 37 CFR 1.182.
  • The responsive paper is limited to 10 pages and must comply with the formal requirements of 37 CFR § 1.52.
  • The responsive paper must be filed no later than 15 days after the service of the patent owner’s pre-order paper. This deadline is also not extendable.
  • The responsive paper must be served on the patent owner in the manner provided by 37 C.F.R. § 1.248.

The Notice explains that this process is being introduced in response to recent increased volume of EPR requests. In implementing this process, the Patent Office is waiving the requirements of 37 CFR 1.530(a) and the second sentence of 1.540, to allow consideration of this new paper. The Notice states that it may consider revisions to the rules if the pre-order papers prove helpful.

Tags

patentability, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Contacts

Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email

*Xu Wang is a law clerk at Finnegan

Copyright © 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP