直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Uniloc v. Hulu: PTAB Can Consider Patent Eligibility under § 101 for Substitute Claims in IPR

August 25, 2020

Authored and Edited by Brandon T. Andersen; Kevin D. Rodkey

In Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) may consider patent eligibility of substitute claims presented in an inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit found that the PTAB’s authority to issue final written decisions determining “patentability” permits it to consider patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for substitute claims presented by a patent owner. For additional details, please see the related post on Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP Blog.

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), patentable subject matter, 35 U.S.C. § 101

Related Practices

Appeals to the PTAB

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Brandon T. Andersen
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2713
Email
Kevin D. Rodkey
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6484
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP