直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Security People v. Iancu: District Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Hear APA Suit Challenging IPR Constitutionality

August 26, 2020

Authored and Edited by Zachery D. Olah; Kevin D. Rodkey

In Security People, Inc. v. Iancu, the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent owner’s Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) suit challenging the constitutionality of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) canceling patent claims in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding. The Federal Circuit explained that constitutional challenges to IPR proceedings can be raised in appeals to the Federal Circuit from the PTAB’s final written decisions and affirmed the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. For additional details, please see the related post on Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP Blog.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA), Administrative Procedure Act (APA), jurisdiction, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), subject matter jurisdiction

Related Practices

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Kevin D. Rodkey
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6484
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

Finnegan IP Summit 2026: Celebrating an Inclusive Talent Pipeline

August 11-13, 2026

Washington, DC

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP