直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

PTAB to Consider Motions for Sanctions Against Kyle Bass and the Coalition for Affordable Drugs

June 17, 2015

Authored and Edited by Linda J. Thayer; Maureen D. Queler

The Board may soon rule on whether the Petitions for Inter Partes Review filed by the Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI, LLC (IPR2015-01092, -1096, -1102, and -1103) against certain patents owned by Celgene Corporation amount to an abuse of process deserving of sanctions. On June 9, 2015, the Board authorized Celgene to file motions for sanctions with its Patent Owner Preliminary Responses, which are due by July 30, 2015. Petitioner will have ten (10) business days to respond, and the Patent Owner five (5) business days to file a Reply. (Paper 7.)

The Coalition is an entity created by Kyle Bass, a hedge-fund manager, who claims to be targeting various patents of major pharmaceutical companies that he alleges drive up prescription drug prices. Patent Owner Celgene alleges that Mr. Bass and his business partner, Erich Spangenberg, have publicly stated that they intend to use the IPR process for the purpose of affecting the value of public companies, which Celgene alleges is an abuse of process and misuse of the IPR proceedings. By authorizing the filing of the motions for sanctions, the Board stressed that it was not deciding on the merits, but rather  allowing briefing that would “facilitate development of a complete record and, thereby, will promote the just resolution of the issues raised by the Patent Owner.”

Tags

37 C.F.R. § 42.12

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Seminar

PTAB Bar Association Thought Leader Summit 2026

October 7, 2026

Alexandria

Reception

CONNECTails: Networking for Biotech Entrepreneurs & Investors

September 17, 2026

Rockville

Virtual Seminar

CNFI IP Seminar

September 9, 2026

Virtual

Articles

California Brings First CCPA and Delete Act Enforcement Action Against Data Broker

September 4, 2026

European IP Blog

The Decision in G 1/25: A More Relaxed Approach to Description Amendments in Europe?

3 September 2026

Webinar

U.S. Discovery for Foreign Proceedings—28 USC § 1782 Requirements and Practice Tips

September 2, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations

August 26, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP