June 13, 2013
Authored and Edited by Jeffrey A. Berkowitz
On June 11, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued its first final written decision in a Post Grant Review proceeding under the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents in case CBM2012-00001 (SAP America, Inc. et al. v. Versata Development Group, Inc.). The PTAB’s decision found all of the challenged claims of Versata’s U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
In particular, the PTAB found that the ’350 patent claims recited abstract ideas that are not eligible for patenting. The ’350 patent claims systems and methods for pricing products using customer and product hierarchies, which the PTAB found to be abstract ideas without “enough significant meaningful limitations to transform these abstract ideas into patent-eligible applications.” The PTAB therefore issued an order cancelling all of the challenged claims as unpatentable. A copy of the PTAB’s decision can be found here.
Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.