直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

PTAB Increasing AIA Trial Fees in January

January 3, 2018

On January 16, 2018, the USPTO will increase its fees for inter partes reviews (IPR), post-grant reviews (PGR), and covered business method reviews (CBM).  We updated Finnegan’s AIA Blog to reflect these new fees, which are also shown below.  The base cost for an IPR increases from $23,000 to $30,500.  Increases for PGR and CBM are more modest, but excess claims fees uniformly increase by 50% regardless of the proceeding type.

Fee Code

37 CFR

Description

Current Fee (USD)

New Fee (USD)

Change

1406

42.15(a)(1)

Inter partes review request fee – Up to 20 claims

9,000.00

15,500.00

+72%

1414

42.15(a)(2)

Inter partes review post-institution fee – Up to 15 claims

14,000.00

15,000.00

+7%

1407

42.15(a)(3)

Inter partes review request of each claim in excess of 20

200.00

300.00

+50%

1415

42.15(a)(4)

Inter partes post-institution request of each claim in excess of 15

400.00

600.00

+50%

1408

42.15(b)(1)

Post-grant or covered business method review request fee – Up to 20 claims

12,000.00

16,000.00

+33%

1416

42.15(b)(2)

Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution fee – Up to 15 claims

18,000.00

22,000.00

+22%

1409

42.15(b)(3)

Post-grant or covered business method review request of each claim in excess of 20

250.00

375.00

+50%

1417

42.15(b)(4)

Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution request of each claim in excess of 15

550.00

825.00

+50%

 

The fees are identical for large, small, and micro entities.  Each of the fees identified in the chart are due at the time the IPR, PGR, or CBM is filed—even the post-institution fees.  If a proceeding is not instituted, the petitioner may request a refund of the post-institution fees.

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), patent filing fees

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Conference

Patent Litigation Europe 2027

January 18-20, 2027

Amsterdam

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 1, 2026

San Jose

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

2026 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference

November 2-4, 2026

Huntington Beach

Conference

Life Sciences Patent Network North America Fall 2026

November 2-3, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP