On January 16, 2018, the USPTO will increase its fees for inter partes reviews (IPR), post-grant reviews (PGR), and covered business method reviews (CBM). We updated Finnegan’s AIA Blog to reflect these new fees, which are also shown below. The base cost for an IPR increases from $23,000 to $30,500. Increases for PGR and CBM are more modest, but excess claims fees uniformly increase by 50% regardless of the proceeding type.
|
Fee Code |
37 CFR |
Description |
Current Fee (USD) |
New Fee (USD) |
Change |
|
1406 |
42.15(a)(1) |
Inter partes review request fee – Up to 20 claims |
9,000.00 |
15,500.00 |
+72% |
|
1414 |
42.15(a)(2) |
Inter partes review post-institution fee – Up to 15 claims |
14,000.00 |
15,000.00 |
+7% |
|
1407 |
42.15(a)(3) |
Inter partes review request of each claim in excess of 20 |
200.00 |
300.00 |
+50% |
|
1415 |
42.15(a)(4) |
Inter partes post-institution request of each claim in excess of 15 |
400.00 |
600.00 |
+50% |
|
1408 |
42.15(b)(1) |
Post-grant or covered business method review request fee – Up to 20 claims |
12,000.00 |
16,000.00 |
+33% |
|
1416 |
42.15(b)(2) |
Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution fee – Up to 15 claims |
18,000.00 |
22,000.00 |
+22% |
|
1409 |
42.15(b)(3) |
Post-grant or covered business method review request of each claim in excess of 20 |
250.00 |
375.00 |
+50% |
|
1417 |
42.15(b)(4) |
Post-grant or covered business method review post-institution request of each claim in excess of 15 |
550.00 |
825.00 |
+50% |
The fees are identical for large, small, and micro entities. Each of the fees identified in the chart are due at the time the IPR, PGR, or CBM is filed—even the post-institution fees. If a proceeding is not instituted, the petitioner may request a refund of the post-institution fees.
Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.