直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Good Record-Keeping: More Important Than Ever Under the AIA

June 28, 2013

Authored and Edited by Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.; Erin M. Sommers, Ph.D.

Post-AIA, no longer can inventors overcome certain types of prior art by proving an earlier date of invention, and interferences will eventually become a proceeding of the past. As a result, many may ask: has the need for laboratory notebooks in patent proceedings become obsolete? The easy answer: no!

The AIA may have thrown out first-to-invent, but good record-keeping practices should not be discarded. The AIA raises many situations where good record-keeping remains a necessity. For example, the USPTO recently issued regulations for Rule 130 declarations used to disqualify grace period prior art.

Records, including laboratory notebooks, can be particularly useful when submitting Rule 130 Declarations under those regulations. The regulations allow an applicant to submit a declaration to disqualify a disclosure as prior art by, first and foremost, establishing that the disclosure was somehow publicly disclosed by the inventor, either directly or indirectly. Thus, the starting point for any Rule 130 declaration is showing that the inventor is the rightful inventive entity. Here, laboratory notebooks and other records carefully kept, timely signed, and witnessed will establish inventorship.

Good records can also assist the declarant in identifying the subject matter and date that information was publicly disclosed. While easy for a publication, establishing the date and content of a prior public disclosure, such as a talk, a poster presentation, an offer for sale, or a public use, may be difficult. In those cases, the USPTO requires that the Rule 130 declaration include “sufficient detail and particularity” to identify the subject matter publicly disclosed. This is where the AIA may demand even more rigorous record keeping than companies previously employed.

Specifically, an applicant needs to be able to establish who, what, where, and when. Those facts may appear easy on their face to establish, but without a printed publication may be hard to corroborate. Consequently, researchers should carefully record when and with whom they discuss their work. Sales and purchasing departments should document any sale or offer for sale. And marketing departments may want to monitor the distribution of samples or prototypes. All of this information, meticulously documented, could later support Rule 130 declarations.

So don’t throw away those notebooks. Now is a good time to revisit record-keeping practices in view of the AIA’s changes.

Contacts

Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4173
Email
Erin M. Sommers, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4292
Email

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Conference

BIA Start-up Festival

May 21, 2026

London

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP