直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Acting Director’s Incorporation by Reference Makes Discretionary Denial Decision Short and Sweet

August 6, 2025

Authored and Edited by P. Michael Nielsen; Jameson K. Gardner, Ph.D.; Forrest A. Jones

In Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Concurrent Ventures, LLC, IPR2025-00486, Paper 9 (PTAB July 17, 2025), USPTO Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart incorporated by reference an earlier referral in Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., v. Concurrent Ventures LLC, IPR2025-00479, Paper 10 (PTAB Jul. 10, 2025). That case, and subsequently this one, were referred because ongoing district court litigation had stalled and the patent owner had not yet developed strong settled expectations.

Pointing to an earlier IPR involving the same parties—IPR2025-00479—the Acting Director explained that this later decision involved “the same discretionary considerations” as the earlier proceeding. This later decision is noteworthy in that the reasoning for referral to the board is not explicitly given. Instead, the opinion incorporates by reference the earlier decision’s reasoning stating “[t]his proceeding presents the same discretionary considerations as those presented in IPR2025-00479.” The Director has used this same procedure to handle other, later filed IPRs facing similar facts.[1]

This decision illustrates that when undertaking multiple related IPRs both patent owners and petitioners should make their best arguments and highlight their most favorable discretionary considerations in the first IPR since the discretionary denial reasoning for that first IPR may be adopted in subsequent related IPRs.

[1] See, e.g., Sportradar AG v. SportsCastr Inc. (d/b/a PANDA Interactive), IPR2025-00634, -00635, Paper 16 (PTAB Jul. 24, 2025; Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, Interstate Power & Light Company, MidAmerican Energy Company, PacifiCorp, WEC Energy Group, Inc., and Wisconsin Power & Light Company v. Birchtech Corp. IPR2025-00422-00423 (PTAB Jul. 17, 2025); Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Corporation v. Maxell, Ltd. IPR2025-00475 (PTAB Jul. 17, 2025); Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Barco N.V. IPR2025-00597, IPR2025-00598 (PTAB Jul. 17, 2025).

Tags

discretionary denials

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

P. Michael Nielsen
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2723
Email
Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email

Copyright © 2025 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP