直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Recent and Developing Trends in False Advertising Disputes

June/July 2018

World Trademark Review

By Douglas A. Rettew; Morgan E. Smith

On January 22, 2018 a group of corporate counsel from various industries sat down with Finnegan attorneys Doug Rettew, Anna Naydonov, and Morgan Smith, and World Trademark Review editor Trevor Little, at the W Hotel in downtown Manhattan to discuss recent and developing trends in false advertising law. Throughout the afternoon, participants discussed a wide range of false advertising topics – including class actions, puffery, use of consumer surveys in false advertising cases, false advertising disputes brought under the Lanham Act, National Advertising Division (NAD) proceedings, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforcement and native advertising. While the exact nature of the afternoon’s discussions – as well as who said what – was meant for only those present, Rettew, Naydonov and Smith have put together a special report detailing some of the key points.

Download the full report below.

Tags

false advertising

Downloadable Files

  • WTR - Recent and Developing Trends in False Advertising Disputes

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Advertising

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Morgan E. Smith
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6665
Email

Originally printed in World Trademark Review in June/July 2018. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Workshop

Protecting Innovation in the Life Sciences: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law

May 7, 2026

Cambridge

Ad Law Buzz Blog

How to Survive a Section 230 Defense: Recent Cases Provide Guidance

May 1, 2026

Articles

Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing

April 24, 2026

Conference

22nd Annual Conference on Paragraph IV Disputes

April 21-22, 2026

New York

Articles

Recent Developments in Video Privacy Protection Act Litigation

April 3, 2026

Webinar

Generative AI Meets Copyright Law: US and UK Perspectives

April 1, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents

March 12, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP