直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

New Regulations from the USPTO on PTAB Proceedings

April 2021

CIPA Journal

By Timothy P. McAnulty; Michael Aragon

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has promulgated two new regulation packages relating to proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board). The first package primarily affects pre-institution practice and applies to petitions filed on or after 8 January 2021. The second package affects motions to amend and applies to proceedings instituted on or after 20 January 2021.

This article summarizes the rule changes, discusses the background leading up to them, and notes some strategic considerations for petitioners and patent owners. While most of the changes formally adopt existing practices, the article highlights their effect and discusses the ongoing debate about the balance between patent owners and petitioners faced with patent challenges before the Board.

Read "New Regulations from the USPTO on PTAB Proceedings"

Tags

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Appeals to the PTAB

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Timothy P. McAnulty
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4348
Email
Michael Aragon
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4133
Email

Originally printed in CIPA Journal on April 2021. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Articles

When the Classroom Goes Dark: Lessons from the Canvas Breach for Corporate Cyber Preparedness

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP