January 12, 2022
Landslide
By Erika Harmon Arner; Jency J. Mathew; Shayda Shahbazi; Sneha Nyshadham
This is the third “Leading by Example” article profiling leading women in intellectual property (IP) law featured in Landslide® magazine.1In this piece, the authors interviewed IP leaders in the public sector about a wide range of topics, including their experiences in public service, education, mentorship, and the future of IP. Participants included:
Each of these remarkable women has had a unique career path that led them to public service. What is also quite evident as a common bond is their distinct and unwavering commitment to advancing intellectual property for the public good.
For Judge Stoll, it was the opportunity to give back to the community that called her into public service, coupled with her respect for her would-be colleagues on the bench. Judge Stoll explains that although she had a “really rewarding and wonderful career in private practice,” “when the opportunity to serve at the court arose, it was my opportunity to give back.”
For Stewart, it was watching her father’s dedication to his service as a federal district court judge. Stewart remarks that “his example and the example of many of my friends who worked in government” was the backdrop of her career.
For others, like Jorgenson, it was private sector experience. In her roles as chief in-house IP counsel and executive director of AIPLA, she saw firsthand the impact of IP on cities and communities—both domestic and international. This encouraged Jorgenson to pursue a role in the public sector. Jorgenson was especially inspired by WIPO’s mission of reaching out to small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries. Helping these companies protect and commercialize their innovation and creativity served to foster economic growth and advancement in those regions. Jorgenson describes her role as “an incredibly unique opportunity to help shape IP and help developing countries grow their economies.”
Chien echoes a similar appreciation for the power of IP to promote the public good. Chien accepted the offer to serve on President Biden’s transition team because “if there’s any time I can do anything to advance the public interest in patent law, then I’m signing up.”
According to Stewart, while obtaining and enforcing IP rights can seem complex, “the USPTO is really in a position to demystify, simplify, and streamline the processes so more people can participate.” Stewart notes that “the USPTO has a lot of programs” and is “working on developing more to assist independent inventors and small businesses and people who’ve been underrepresented in the system.” With emerging technologies like machine learning and artificial intelligence, Stewart hopes that “artificial intelligence will be able to help independent inventors and small businesses file and prosecute patent applications and identify prior art and put their claims in condition for allowance.”
Kocialski says that her favorite aspect of her public role is “meeting people who are implementing their dreams.” Kocialski is often reminded of the important role that IP plays in peoples’ personal lives and in the American dream, adding: “I always tell examiners . . . that the patent application in front of you is not just a piece of paper. It is somebody’s dreams, it’s their hopes, it might be the way that they’re bringing their family out of tragedy.”
Coggins also notes that “IP rights incentivize creators to invent and create by giving them ownership of their ideas and the exclusive right to use them.” Coggins says that giving inventors these rights “serves as the foundation for new businesses to develop and for jobs to be created from new products that are going into the market, and that resulting economic growth is so fundamental to the mission of the Department of Commerce.”
Judge Stoll emphasizes that emerging technologies are helping not only independent inventors and small businesses but the public as a whole. Judge Stoll’s view is that “if it wasn’t for strong intellectual property protection in the United States, we wouldn’t be able to have been in a position to develop the new mRNA vaccine so quickly and to test existing drugs to see which ones could effectively treat COVID-19.” She thinks that without innovations in technology, we might not have had “the technology that we needed in order to be able to work remotely and do what we’re doing right now.”
Another common theme that emerges among the women is the importance of continued education and lessons that can be learned from making mistakes. Jorgenson describes mistakes as a vehicle for growth and learning in both professional and personal settings. “There are very few mistakes that anybody could make that are catastrophic in nature. So, when you’re working with people, let them make mistakes. And then after the fact, try to explain to them why you thought it might have been a mistake and ways that it could have been handled differently,” which will allow them to grow professionally.
Coggins has a similar sentiment, emphasizing the importance of “being accountable when mistakes are made” and of making sure team members are “allowed to fail and recover.” According to Coggins, this is so critical in building trust and confidence in employees—which is the key to empowerment and future success.
Kocialski emphasizes that continuous education, whether of the public or at the USPTO itself, is necessary in the field of IP. Kocialski notes that the USPTO refers to itself as “America’s Innovation Agency” because it is charged with “protecting America’s innovations.” “What I love about the agency is its own willingness to innovate as well. We’re not afraid to get hard feedback and really take a look at it and change if we have to. And that’s awesome,” she says.
The interviewees agree that there is more than one “right” way to mentor and be mentored. When it comes to seeking mentors, Coggins recommends “actively seeking mentors who really don’t think like you do.” Coggins says that she makes an effort to surround herself with people who push her outside of her comfort zone: “I think we gravitate naturally to people who are more like us. But I don’t always need someone to reinforce my thinking. What I actually need is someone to challenge me, to push me to think differently and have those productive kinds of discourse and conversations.” Coggins credits her professional success, in part, to her ability to find different mentors. She notes, “what really stretched me and really elevated my performance was seeking people who didn’t think like me, they didn’t approach problems like I did, they were so very different. Now it doesn’t mean that I adapted or adopted everything that they were doing, but I certainly learned what worked for me and what didn’t work for me, and it really, really elevated my performance.”
Jorgenson has found that throughout her career, friends and colleagues made for great mentors. Her view is that “you may not even know that someone is actually mentoring you or sponsoring you” until “you learn a year or more later that they threw your name into the hat for that next job that someone was hiring for.” But she also emphasizes the importance of being a role model to others. She recalls watching her role models and striving to “emulate that person and follow in their footsteps. I don’t know if they would have thought of themselves as mentors, but I was watching their careers.”
In reflecting upon her relationships with students, fellow moms, and colleagues as examples of positive mentors in her life, Chien notes that those relationships were invaluable to her. She saw how others dealt with similar situations, and that gave her the assurance that she “wasn’t alone in juggling all that is happening” and provided the necessary support in “figuring out how to balance the different priorities.”
To this end, Judge Stoll recommends taking time in your day to foster those important relationships. She suggests that everyone “take a break every day for one hour during lunch” because “by forcing yourself to put that hour in your schedule,” you can “use that time to catch up on messages” and form relationships.
Notwithstanding recent advancements in the field of IP, there remains work to be done to ensure that the future of IP is inclusive for all. These leaders all were happy to share their beliefs about the future.
Chien hopes that the future of IP policy and practice promotes patenting inclusion. She looks forward to seeing “growing diversity in who participates in innovation, including entrepreneurs and young companies of all kinds leveraging their IP to grow their businesses and build an inclusive economy.” Coggins explains that she is “inspired by the opportunities that are evolving and going to continue to evolve” and sees “public service as a fundamental piece to that.” She is hopeful that “policy and practice can adjust to this changing world.”
Kocialski’s belief is that “what America needs to do is to figure out how to make sure that the IP system is accessible by all. Any brain that wants to invent, they should be able to invent. They should be able to get through the system, and they should be able to build on those hopes and dreams.” Stewart is inspired all the time by the “brilliant and hard-working people” in the private sector, along with the nonpartisan collaboration among congressional members, past USPTO leaders, and stakeholders to better the current system. Stewart believes that the future is bright.
All of these remarkable women have unique career paths that led them to public service. All six encourage those who are interested to continue working hard and taking those opportunities to serve the community. Judge Stoll’s call to action is to “fake it ’til you make it.” Stewart’s encouraging words make it clear that “if you are a hard-working person and do great work, in the long run, those opportunities are going to come for you.”
1. See Erika Harmon Arner & Jessica L. A. Marks, Leading by Example: Words of Wisdom from Women Leaders in IP, LANDSLIDE, Mar./Apr. 2018, at 42, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/publications/landslide/2017-18/march-april/leading-example; Erika Harmon Arner, Jency J. Mathew & Courtney Kasuboski, Leading by Example: Elevating Women through Intentionality, LANDSLIDE, Nov./Dec. 2019, at 52, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/publications/landslide/2019-2 0/november-december/leading-example-elevating-women-through-intentionality.
Reprinted with permission from the Vol. 14, No. 2, December/January 2022 edition of Landslide ©2022 by the American Bar Association. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.