直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Is AI Pushing the Envelope of IP Protection?

November 17, 2020

World Intellectual Property Review

By Frank A. DeCosta, Ph.D.; Amanda E. Stephenson; Harry Feng, Ph.D.

The number of patent applications using artificial intelligence (AI) technology filed in the U.S. doubled between 2002 and 2018. With no sign of these numbers decreasing and every expectation that they will continue to grow, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has undertaken several initiatives to explore the boundaries of existing IP law and its suitability to address AI-based innovation.

The USPTO has twice issued requests for comments (RFCs) to obtain feedback from the public regarding a variety of policy issues associated with protecting AI-related IP. A team of USPTO experts reported the feedback in October 2020. The impetus for the October 2020 report began back in January 2019 when the USPTO held an AI IP policy conference, which included panels on IP rights regarding AI technology. In August 2019, the USPTO issued an RFC on patenting AI inventions. The comment period ended on November 8, 2019.

In this article, Frank DeCosta, Aliza Carrano, Amanda Stephenson, and Harry Feng discuss the findings on the UPSTO’s report.

Read the full article here.

Tags

AI + Patent

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Frank A. DeCosta, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4012
Email

Originally printed in World Intellectual Property Review on November 17, 2020. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP