直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Inter Partes Review in ANDA Litigation

2016

ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Second Edition

By Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) aimed to provide cost-effective alternatives to district court litigation through expedited review of issued patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) through post-grant review. One procedure in particular, inter partes review (IPR), permits a petitioner to challenge an issued patent's validity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 based on patents and printed publications. The unique statutory framework of Hatch-Waxman litigation, however, requires patent owners and challengers alike to carefully consider the potential implications IPR has on current or anticipated Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation. Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D. discusses the statute and regulations governing IPR, explain the unique interplay between the Hatch-Waxman Act and IPR proceedings, and provide helpful strategies for patent owners and challengers contemplating or anticipating concurrent ANDA litigation and post-grant review.

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Professionals

Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4092
Email

Originally printed in ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Second Edition in 2016. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP