直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Inter Partes Review in ANDA Litigation

2016

ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Second Edition

By Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) aimed to provide cost-effective alternatives to district court litigation through expedited review of issued patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) through post-grant review. One procedure in particular, inter partes review (IPR), permits a petitioner to challenge an issued patent's validity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 based on patents and printed publications. The unique statutory framework of Hatch-Waxman litigation, however, requires patent owners and challengers alike to carefully consider the potential implications IPR has on current or anticipated Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation. Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D. discusses the statute and regulations governing IPR, explain the unique interplay between the Hatch-Waxman Act and IPR proceedings, and provide helpful strategies for patent owners and challengers contemplating or anticipating concurrent ANDA litigation and post-grant review.

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Professionals

Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4092
Email

Originally printed in ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Second Edition in 2016. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Conference

Patent Litigation Europe 2027

January 18-20, 2027

Amsterdam

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

NAPABA Convention 2026

November 12-14, 2026

Los Angeles

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 10, 2026

San Jose

Charitable

2026 ALYN Hospital Wheels of Love Ride

November 8-12, 2026

Northern District

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP