April 16, 2025
The US-Israel Legal Review
Many General Counsel (GCs) view patents as outside their core responsibilities, leaving patent strategy to engineers, R&D teams, or outside counsel. However, in today’s competitive landscape, the GC is often the only link between the C-suite and the strategic management of the company’s patent portfolio. If the GC isn’t guiding executives on patent positioning and expenditures, no one is.
C-suite leaders increasingly rely on the GC to ensure that patents serve business objectives, provide competitive advantages, and justify their costs. Without a GC-driven strategy, patent investments can become disconnected from the company’s broader goals, leading to unnecessary spending and missed opportunities.
While GCs don’t need to be patent experts, they must ensure that the company’s IP efforts are aligned with its strategic vision. This involves:
To maximize the value of the company’s patent portfolio, the GC should consider working with an outside patent strategist who goes beyond traditional patent prosecution. A strategist can:
• Identify gaps in patent coverage that competitors might exploit
• Develop a filing strategy that balances protection and cost efficiency
• Align the company’s IP strategy with investment, partnerships, and market expansion
Unlike traditional patent counsel who primarily focus on obtaining patents, a strategist ensures that every patent serves a clear business purpose.
The GC plays a critical role in ensuring that patent investments support the company’s business strategy. If the GC doesn’t take the lead in guiding the C-suite on patents, no one will. By taking a proactive approach and leveraging external expertise where needed, the GC can turn patents into a true competitive advantage—rather than just a legal expense.
Originally printed in the US-Israel Legal Review on April 16, 2025. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.