直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

The Critical Patent Role of General Counsel

April 16, 2025

The US-Israel Legal Review

By Gerson S. Panitch

Many General Counsel (GCs) view patents as outside their core responsibilities, leaving patent strategy to engineers, R&D teams, or outside counsel. However, in today’s competitive landscape, the GC is often the only link between the C-suite and the strategic management of the company’s patent portfolio. If the GC isn’t guiding executives on patent positioning and expenditures, no one is.

C-suite leaders increasingly rely on the GC to ensure that patents serve business objectives, provide competitive advantages, and justify their costs. Without a GC-driven strategy, patent investments can become disconnected from the company’s broader goals, leading to unnecessary spending and missed opportunities.

The GC’s Role in Aligning Patents with Business Strategy

While GCs don’t need to be patent experts, they must ensure that the company’s IP efforts are aligned with its strategic vision. This involves:

  1. Educating the C-Suite on the Business Role of Patents – The GC must translate complex patent issues into business-relevant insights, helping executives understand how patents protect key revenue streams, enhance valuation, and serve as competitive tools. Without this guidance, patents are often seen as a legal expense rather than a strategic asset.
  2. Ensuring Patent Investments Are Justified – The GC should regularly assess whether patent expenditures align with corporate priorities. This includes reviewing whether patents are effectively blocking competitors, supporting key technologies, and contributing to growth.
  3. Bridging the Gap Between Legal, Business, and Technical Teams – Engineers tend to focus on technical nuance, while patent attorneys focus on translating that nuance into protection. Without strategic oversight, this leads to technically sound but commercially irrelevant patents. The GC must ensure that patent decisions serve broader business goals.

Working with an Outside Patent Strategist

To maximize the value of the company’s patent portfolio, the GC should consider working with an outside patent strategist who goes beyond traditional patent prosecution. A strategist can:
•    Identify gaps in patent coverage that competitors might exploit
•    Develop a filing strategy that balances protection and cost efficiency
•    Align the company’s IP strategy with investment, partnerships, and market expansion

Unlike traditional patent counsel who primarily focus on obtaining patents, a strategist ensures that every patent serves a clear business purpose.

Conclusion

The GC plays a critical role in ensuring that patent investments support the company’s business strategy. If the GC doesn’t take the lead in guiding the C-suite on patents, no one will. By taking a proactive approach and leveraging external expertise where needed, the GC can turn patents into a true competitive advantage—rather than just a legal expense.

Tags

global patent strategy, R&D Investment

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Gerson S. Panitch
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4000
Email

Originally printed in the US-Israel Legal Review on April 16, 2025. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP