直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

China’s “Hatch-Waxman” System: A Comparative Overview

September 8, 2021

Westlaw

By Li Feng, Ph.D.; Yicong (Eve) Du; Hongyi Jiang

Introduction

China’s 2020 Amended Patent Law (“2020 Amendment”) introduces a “Hatch-Waxman” like patent linkage system, which took effect on June 1, 2021. Article 76 of the 2020 Amendment outlines a general framework, allowing early patent dispute resolution before generic drug approval.

In the past, generic drugs could be approved and enter the market in China even though they may be infringing certain patents. A patent owner had no cause of action to bring a patent infringement suit until a generic drug had actually entered the market, because filing a generic application per se was not an infringement act in China.

Under the new framework, a patent owner/new drug application (NDA) holder can initiate a civil judicial proceeding or an administrative adjudication proceeding (collectively “an Article 76 action”) prior to marketing approval of an allegedly infringing generic drug product.

Article 76 of the 2020 Amendment is extremely brief, which states in its entirety the following:

During the drug marketing authorization review period, if disputes arise around the drug-related patents, the applicant and the patent holder or other interested party may file suit before a court to seek legal judgment on whether the drug falls within the patent protection scope.

The National Medical Products Administration may decide to stay the drug marketing authorization based on an effective court ruling. Alternatively, the parties may petition for an administrative ruling at the China National Intellectual Property Administration.

Three Chinese government agencies, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), and the Supreme People’s Court were tasked to implement Article 76 of the 2020 Amendment. After about a month of delay from the anticipated release date, three sets of implementing measures were issued in early July this year. They are

  1. “Measures on the Early Resolution Mechanism for Drug-Related Patent Disputes” (referred to as “the Early Dispute Resolution Measures” herein) jointly by NMPA and CNIPA, issued and effective on July 4, 2021, accompanied with a policy interpretation presented in a form of questions and answers (“Policy Interpretation”);
  2. “Legal Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Disputes over Drug Patent Linkage” (“Legal Provisions”) by the Supreme People’s Court, issued and effective on July 5, 2021, and
  3. “Measures on Administrative Adjudication in the Early Resolution Mechanism for Drug-Related Patent Disputes” (“Administrative Adjudication Measures”) by the CNIPA, issued and effective on July 5, 2021.

This Article provides a preliminary overview of the Chinese patent linkage system and a comparison with the United States Hatch-Waxman framework.

Read the full version of "China’s “Hatch-Waxman” System: A Comparative Overview" here. 

Tags

China, new drug application (NDA), generic drug

For more information

  • PUBLISHED - Thomson Reuters Westlaw - China’s “Hatch-Waxman” System_A Comparative Overview - LF YD HJ - 09.08.21

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Offices

Shanghai

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Li Feng, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4382
Email

©2021 Thompson Reuters. Originally published by Westlaw. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

31st Annual UMass Chan Research Retreat

October 14-15, 2026

Worcester

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP