April 30, 2010
American University Law Review
By Donald R. Dunner; Esther H. Lim; Bryan C. Diner
This article, by Finnegan attorneys Don Dunner, Bryan Diner, Esther Lim, Troy Grabow, Tina Hulse, and Joyce Craig examines the most important cases and legal, political and judicial changes in U.S. patent law in 2009. In particular, the authors note that the USPTO removed from its regulations highly controversial rules regarding claims from continuation practice. The authors also address significant changes in the judicial branch at both the U.S. Supreme Court and also the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: highly significant rulings are expected which will affect the written description requirement and the most basic question of patent law--patentable subject matter (Bilski v. Kappos). Further patent law developments emanated from Congress in 2009, when legislators introduced a set of patent reform bills in both houses. The article examines in detail the significance of these and other changes.
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.