April 17, 2018
Managing Intellectual Property
On April 16, 2018 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical, a case that explores whether lost profit damages abroad are entitled in domestic infringement cases based on extraterritoriality. Managing Intellectual Property reached to Finnegan partner Charles Collins-Chase for his perspective of the oral arguments.
Charles said, "The tenor of the arguments seemed to lean towards favoring the petitioner's position, and arguing that lost profits should be available." However, he added, "There is some concern that if the Supreme Court reverses [the Federal Circuit's decision to not allow extraterritorial lost profit damages], companies may have an incentive to manufacture things abroad so they would not be subject to this type of infringement and lost profits analysis."
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.