April 17, 2018
Managing Intellectual Property
On April 16, 2018 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical, a case that explores whether lost profit damages abroad are entitled in domestic infringement cases based on extraterritoriality. Managing Intellectual Property reached to Finnegan partner Charles Collins-Chase for his perspective of the oral arguments.
Charles said, "The tenor of the arguments seemed to lean towards favoring the petitioner's position, and arguing that lost profits should be available." However, he added, "There is some concern that if the Supreme Court reverses [the Federal Circuit's decision to not allow extraterritorial lost profit damages], companies may have an incentive to manufacture things abroad so they would not be subject to this type of infringement and lost profits analysis."
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.