December 11, 2014
On December 4, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Bloomberg BNA contacted Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill to provide comment on the scope of the coverage of Apple's design patents and the amount of damages that can be expected. Ferrillnoted that while counsel did not disagree the patents at issue each covered “a slice of the iPhone,” they did disagree on the impact the “functional elements” of design would have on “the overall impression of the claimed ornamental features." Ferrill also noted “an uphill battle” with regard to Samsung’s damages argument.
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named Firm of the Year at the 2024 Managing Intellectual Property Americas Awards
April 26, 2024
Commentary
World IP Day: EPO Reveals 33% Jump in Cleantech Inventions Over Five Years
April 26, 2024
Commentary
April 11, 2024
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.