July 17, 2014
IEEE Spectrum
Alice Corporation vs. CLS Bank was one of several IP cases from the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court term that will have a significant impact on future patent cases. The case revolved around Alice Corporation’s patents for computer-based financial systems—patents that CLS Bank deemed invalid. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of CLS Bank, citing that the patents were invalid because they were abstract, and therefore cannot be patented.
Finnegan attorney Linda J. Thayer discusses the Alice Corporation vs. CLS Bank ruling with IEEE Spectrum’s “Techwise Conversations.” To listen to a podcast of this conversation, please click here.
Media Mention
Finnegan Shortlisted for the 2024 Asian Legal Business Japan Law Awards
April 26, 2024
Commentary
April 11, 2024
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.