直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Manufacturing

About

Manufacturing is part of our work in Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials.

Protecting innovation and manufacturing change

Manufacturing powers the world’s economy and is a large, diverse, and highly innovative sector. From farm machinery to chemicals to telecommunications and everything in between, manufacturing plays a crucial role in producing goods across all aspects of the economy. Manufacturers constantly develop new products, enhance supply chains, improve inventory control, and face increased competition. To expand market share, increase profitability, and remain competitive, innovations need solid protection and practical enforcement strategies. Finnegan has a long history of working with manufacturers of all sizes. Like our clients, we never stop working.

Understanding the law, science, and technology

Finnegan professionals work on a wide range of projects for manufacturing companies, including Fortune 100 and Global 1000 companies. Our work includes building portfolios to protect innovations that better measure machine workflow; patent mapping and mining alternative energy landscapes; negotiating and drafting worldwide manufacturing licenses; developing comprehensive IP protection for aftermarket parts; analyzing government contracts in the aeronautical field; counseling clients on export controls for computer equipment; and litigating before the U.S. International Trade Commission.

We handle matters for clients in virtually every sector:

  • Alternative energy technologies
  • Automobiles
  • Construction
  • Electric lighting and wiring
  • Electrical transmission and distribution
  • Engine systems
  • Fabricated metals
  • Farm and garden machinery
  • Iron and steel foundries
  • Lumber and wood products
  • Metalworking machinery and equipment
  • Nonferrous foundries
  • Oil and drilling
  • Pumps and valves
  • Robotics
  • Search, detection, navigation, and guidance systems
  • Textiles

We help by:

  • Enforcing IP against infringers and monetizing portfolios
  • Capturing innovations, drafting applications, and building portfolios
  • Conducting freedom to operate studies and providing ongoing counseling for new and evolving technologies
  • Conducting due diligence investigations
  • Counseling on government contracts and export regulations
  • Counseling in all areas of IP protection, including trade secrets, design patents, trademarks, copyright, and advertising services

Everyone in this industry

Experience

In Re Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same

Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.

337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot

Eastman Chemical Company & Others v. Covr Group Limited & Another
Finnegan represented Eastman Chemical Company, an independent global specialty materials company, and several of its subsidiaries in a UK dispute concerning copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and breach of contract before the UK High Court. The dispute centered on a proprietary database of patterns used in automotive paint protection film. The parties reached a confidential settlement and the Defendants agreed not to infringe Eastman intellectual property rights in the future.

IL-2024-000026, UK High Court

IP services for Tetra Tech

Finnegan assists Tetra Tech, Inc., a leading provider of high-end consulting and engineering services, with comprehensive patent services including litigation, counseling, and opinions related to railroad technologies. Finnegan also provides trademark search, opinion, and prosecution services to Tetra Tech.

Patent protection for innovative golfing technology

Finnegan assists Acushnet Company, a leading manufacturer of golf equipment, clothing, and accessories, with the development and protection of its patent portfolio through strategic patent drafting and prosecution across a variety of technologies.

Patent services for leading electric flying taxi company Archer Aviation Inc.

Finnegan assists Archer Aviation, a leading urban air mobility company responsible for designing, developing, manufacturing, and operating electric vertical takeoff and landing aircrafts to carry passengers, with matters related to patent application drafting and global prosecution. We also provide patent counseling services.

US Synthetic Corporation (USS) v. International Trade Commission (ITC)

Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).

23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll

More

Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

Articles

Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing

April 24, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reverses Indefiniteness Ruling on Means-Plus-Function Claim

April 15, 2026

Articles

Prosecution History Estoppel: Navigating Limits on Equivalents in Patent Litigation

March/April 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – April 2026

April 6, 2026

More

News

Commentary

Squires’ Latest PTAB Memo Seeks to Boost U.S. Manufacturing with New Discretionary Factors

March 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Shortlisted for the 2025 Asian Legal Business Korea Law Awards

October 20, 2025

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named International Intellectual Property Law Firm of the Year by Asian Legal Business

November 7, 2024

Press Release

Finnegan Elects Eight New Partners

January 3, 2023

Commentary

2022 Review: Big Guns Back the PTAB

December 8, 2022

Media Mention

Caterpillar Scores Wins in Road Milling IP Fight at Fed. Circ.

February 10, 2021

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP