Experience
UTStarcom, Inc.
Starent Networks Corp.
Represented Starent Networks in a complex patent, trade secret, and copyright case involving wireless telecommunications infrastructure technology in which the plaintiff alleged 20 counts against Starent and 18 of its current or former employees. Prior to settlement, all but four claims and four defendants were dismissed through motion practice, and the court granted Starent's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement on one of the patents-in-suit.
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp., 1:07-cv-02585, N.D. Ill., Judges Lindberg, Nolan
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.
Starent Networks Corp.
Nortel Networks, Ltd v. Optical Networks Inc.; Ciena Corp.
Nortel Networks Ltd.
Power Integrations, Inc. v. BCD Semiconductor Corp.
BCD Semiconductor Corp.
W.R. Grace
F5 Networks, Inc. v A10 Networks, Inc.
A10 Networks, Inc.
Cellport Systems, Inc. v. HTC Corp.
HTC Corp.
HTC Corp.
Allergan Inc. v. Pharmacia Corp.
Allergan, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.