Experience
United States Automobile Association
Truist Bank, N.A.
Represented Truist Bank in a patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against USAA, who asserted five patents directed to mobile deposit technologies. After asserting counterclaims on six patents and filing IPR petitions for each of USAA’s asserted patents, Finnegan’s strategy led to a favorable dismissal.
United States Automobile Association v. Truist Bank, N.A., 2:22-cv-00291, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Truist Bank v. United States Automobile Association, IPR2022-01593, IPR2023-00143, -00144, -00183, -00184, -00829, PTAB, Judges Dirba, Droesch, McMillin, White, Zecher
Liberty Access Technologies Licensing LLC v. ASSA ABLOY AB et al.
ASSA ABLOY AB et al.
R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,
Scramoge Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG, et al.
Volkswagen AG, et al.
Universal Arbor LLC v. Robert Bosch GmbH
Robert Bosch GmbH
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. FedEx Corp.
FedEx Corp.
Groove Digital, Inc. v. United Bank
United Bank
FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Flectere LLC v. FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corporation
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.