Experience
Medinol Ltd.
Guidant Corp.
Represented Guidant in a patent infringement case involving coronary stents, which ended with a favorable settlement for defendant on the fourth day of jury deliberations.
Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp., 1:03-cv-02604, S.D.N.Y., Judges Scheindlin, Francis
Anvik Corp. v. HannStar Display Corp.
HannStar Display Corp.
Philips Electronics v. IP Global, Ltd.
IP Global, Ltd.
Guidant Corp. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.
U.S. Philips Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.
U.S. Philips Corp.; Sharp Corp.
Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.
Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch + Lomb Inc.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. iGuzzini Lighting USA, Ltd., et al.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Cordis Corp. v. Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)
Guidant Inc. (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc.)
Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Koninklijke Philips NV and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al. v. ASOS PLC. et al.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.