Experience
Nimco Schoenbedrijven BV
Spring Footwear Corp.
During a shoe industry trade show, our client Nimco discovered that Spring Footwear was promoting a new line of shoes that incorporated Nimco's proprietary outsole design. The counterfeit outsole was identical to Nimco's outsole in every way, not only encompassing the design elements, but also containing Nimco's logo and its patent numbers. To avoid future displays of the counterfeit outsole, Nimco asked us to immediately file suit against Spring Footwear. As a result of the litigation, Spring Footwear withdrew the counterfeit shoe from the market and commenced settlement discussions. The case has since settled in favorable terms for our client.
Nimco Schoenbedrijven BV v. Spring Footwear Corp., 1:09-cv-02478, N.D. Ga., Judge Thrash
Danaklon Americas v. Hercules, Inc.
Hercules Inc.
FedEx Corp. Services v. Eclipse IP (now Electronic Communication Technologies)
FedEx Corp. Services
Wonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v. Kids II, Inc.
Wonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd.
AbbVie Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
AbbVie Inc.
Anvik Corp. v. HannStar Display Corp.
HannStar Display Corp.
W.R. Grace
Bridgestone Firestone v. ContiTech
Bridgestone Firestone
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.