August 21, 2012
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) establishes several new post-grant trial proceedings to be conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”), including inter partes review (“IPR”), post-grant review (“PGR”), and the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents (“TCBM”), and also provides for derivation proceedings. On August 14, 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued final rules governing these proceedings and practice before the Board. Specifically, the USPTO issued the following four notices that relate to these procedures and cover related topics:
The rule package entitled “Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions” provides a consolidated set of rules relating to trial practice before the Board for IPR, PGR, the TCBM, and derivation proceedings. This package sets forth, among other things:
This package also provides a consolidated set of rules to implement the provisions of the AIA related to seeking judicial review of Board decisions.
Concurrently, the USPTO published a practice guide entitled “Office Patent Trial Practice Guide” to advise the public on the general framework of the procedures and the governing regulations, including the structure and times for taking action in each of the new proceedings.
In addition to providing rules for practicing before the Board, the USPTO also issued a rule package entitled “Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents.” This package provides rules related specifically to IPR, PGR, and the TCBM. For instance, this package sets forth, among other things:
The USPTO also issued a rules package entitled “Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents—Definitions of Covered Business Method Patent and Technological Invention.” This package provides the rule that sets forth the definitions of the terms ‘‘covered business method patent’’ and ‘‘technological invention’’ as required by the AIA. Specifically, section 18 of the AIA provides that the USPTO may institute what has been referred to as the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents or TCBM. Section 18(d)(1) specifies that a “covered business method patent” is “a patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service, except that the term does not include patents for technological inventions,” and section 18(d)(2) requires the USPTO to issue regulations for determining whether a patent is for a technological invention.
Consistent with these statutory provisions, the USPTO issued this rules package to set forth the definitions of the terms ‘‘covered business method patent’’ and ‘‘technological invention.’’ Specifically, 37 C.F.R. § 42.301(a) defines “covered business method patent” in the same way as the statute. As for “technological invention,” section 42.301(b) states that, “[i]n determining whether a patent is for a technological invention . . . , the following will be considered on a case-by-case basis: whether the claimed subject matter as a whole recites a technological feature that is novel and unobvious over the prior art; and solves a technical problem using a technical solution.”
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.
Webinar
June 13, 2024
Webinar
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Conference
16th Annual Practitioners’ Think Tank on ITC Litigation & Enforcement
May 29-30, 2024
Washington
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.