January 26, 2024
Authored and Edited by Jennifer E. Fried
“Natural” claims are infamously risky business. Between the specter of class action lawsuits, FTC actions, and competitor challenges, claims that a product is “natural” require special vigilance. A recent NAD case addresses a threshold question that comes up, time and again, in practice: what exactly constitutes a natural claim?
In the recent Pamprin Botanicals case filed by Bayer Consumer Heaelth (Bayer) against Focus Consumer Healthcare (Focus), NAD considered the challenger’s argument that the claim “naturally good for you ingredients” conveyed a message about the naturalness of Pamprin Botanical’s ingredients. NAD found that it does. It noted that the “naturally good for you ingredients” claim appears alongside a list of the product’s ingredients as well as the visual of a leaf. While NAD found that the claim did not suggest that the “product as a whole” was a natural one, NAD did determine that the “naturally good for you ingredients” claim conveyed that the listed ingredients are, indeed, natural. NAD noted “[t]here is no evidence in the record as to whether the five ingredients listed are indeed natural,” and recommended that the advertiser remove the claim and avoid conveying this message.
NAD’s finding on this issue is reminiscent of the 2016 Naturally Dry case, where NAD found that the “Naturally Dry” product name conveyed the message that natural ingredients were responsible for the dryness provided by the antiperspirant—a message NAD deemed unsupported.
Key Takeaways
|
Challenger Bayer also took issue with Focus’s product name--Pamprin Botanicals--on the grounds that this name, too, implied that the product was natural. On this point, NAD sided with the advertiser. Despite the word “Botanical” in the product name, NAD trotted out its familiar standard on name change recommendations: “As a general rule, absent extrinsic evidence that consumers have been confused or misled, NAD will not require an advertiser to change the name of a product simply because a challenger suspects that it may be misleading.”
Here, NAD determined that the name “Pamprin Botanicals” was not expressly false. “Botanical” is defined as “of or relating to plants or botany” or “derived from plants”—a message that was supported in this case. But NAD found that “[n]othing in the plain language of the name conveys the message that all ingredients in Pamprin Botanicals are plant based or that it is an all-natural product.” In reaching its conclusion, NAD distinguished this case from Zarbees Naturals, where NAD found that the product name did, in fact, convey a “natural” message.
Copyright © 2024 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.