The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu, ruling that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must decide the validity of all challenged claims in America Invents Act (AIA) reviews, rather than selecting a subset of challenged claims to rule. While the decision could simplify certain patent disputes, questions still arise for the PTAB and for litigants. Law360 contacted Finnegan partner Josh Goldberg for his thoughts on the decision.
The decision will impact the PTAB's workload, with practitioners suggesting that the patent office may hire additional PTAB judges to help deal with the increase or the PTAB could start issuing less detailed decisions. Josh said, "Given this ruling and the court’s specific reference to their binary choice, it’s possible the board could stop issuing lengthy institution decisions and instead just have one word—it’s instituted or it’s not instituted—and that’s it."
Commentary
World IP Day: EPO Reveals 33% Jump in Cleantech Inventions Over Five Years
April 26, 2024
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Shortlisted for the 2024 Asian Legal Business Japan Law Awards
April 26, 2024
Commentary
April 11, 2024
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.