On January 6, 2021, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a memo confirming the Nautilus approach to indefiniteness should be used to address indefiniteness in America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant proceedings. Bloomberg Law contacted Josh Goldberg for his thoughts on the guidance.
There has been confusion about which approach to indefiniteness applies to PTAB trials. The approach used during patent examination follows the In Re Packard ruling, while district courts follow the Nautilus. At the PTAB, Josh said it is not uncommon for companies to make their arguments under both approaches. He said, “The fact that now they are clarifying that we should be using Nautilus is helpful because it will allow parties to know which argument they need to be focusing on.”
Read the full article here.
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Shortlisted for the 2024 Asian Legal Business Japan Law Awards
April 26, 2024
Commentary
April 11, 2024
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.