In 2014, the Supreme Court’s Nautilus decision shined the spotlight back on the definiteness requirement for patent claims and also changed the standard for indefiniteness from “insolubly ambiguous” to “reasonable certainty.”
While the impact of this new standard is debatable, it is nonetheless a consideration in application and claim drafting. Please join us for a practical discussion on topics that include:
This webinar is the first segment of Finnegan’s winter 2016 series, “Moving Target or Opportunity: Strategic Considerations in Today’s Changing U.S. Patent Landscape.”
Adriana L. Burgy
John M. Mulcahy
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
7:30 - 8:30 a.m. India
10:00 - 11:00 a.m. China/Taiwan
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Japan/Korea
claim construction, indefiniteness (35 USC § 112), Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instrument Inc., patent application
Conference
2024 Licensing Executives Society USA – Canada Annual Meeting
October 20-23, 2024
New Orleans
Conference
4th Annual Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA
October 8-24, 2024
Virtual
Conference
2024 Corporate Counsel Women of Color: Career Strategies Conference
October 2-5, 2024
Las Vegas
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.