Experience
Philip OINESS and Sun Products Group, Inc.
Walgreen Co.
When Walgreen Co. faced a damage award of nearly $20 million, including prejudgment interest, for infringement of a patent on a “head chair,” the company turned to Finnegan. Although Walgreen had sold only $220,000 of the product, a jury awarded over $1 million in lost profits and another $10 million in future lost profits, which grew to nearly $20 million with interest. On appeal, the Federal Circuit agreed with our argument that the jury award, and the expert testimony on which it was based, was so speculative that it could not stand. The court granted a remittitur, reducing the damage award to $220,000—the amount of actual sales—and further reversed the award of prejudgment interest as it was based on future sales that had not occurred.
Philip OINESS and Sun Products Group, Inc. v. Walgreen Co., 95-1138, -1164, -1205, Fed. Cir., Judges Mayer, Cowen, Rader
$45 million judgment overturned for Ericsson
Ericsson Inc.
Telcordia Technologies
United Catalysts turns to Finnegan to reverse an unfavorable judgment and $80 million in damages
United Catalysts
LG Electronics Inc.
LG wins major counterfeit headsets case and scores over $168 million
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A.
Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication
TCL Communication Technology
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.