December 6, 2016
Forbes
On December 6, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Samsung Electronics in Samsung v. Apple, tossing a nearly $400 million Federal Circuit decision which ordered Samsung to pay damages equal to its entire profit from smartphones with design elements that infringed Apple’s iPhone design. The Supreme Court disagreed with the Federal Circuit’s stance on awarding total profit damages for infringing a component of a product [article of manufacture], as a component may be integrated into a larger product. Forbes contacted Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill for her thoughts on the decision.
Ferrill believes that the Supreme Court didn’t provide much guidance on how to determine what a design patent covers or how much it might contribute to damages. She said the decision leaves the Federal Circuit to develop a test for determining what exactly a given patent covers and how to apportion damages for an "article of manufacture". Ferrill said, "Given the paucity of cases in this once-arcane area of patent law, courts have a lot of work ahead of them to define the boundaries of design patents and the damages available when they infringed."
Press Release
September 11, 2024
Announcement
Finnegan and Partner Daniel Chung Recognized by The National Law Journal
September 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.