Partner
Justin Hasford has experience in all areas of intellectual property law. His practice focuses on complex patent litigation at the trial and appellate levels on behalf of pioneer pharmaceutical companies. He has particular experience with cases arising from Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) under the Hatch-Waxman Act and in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Justin has also litigated trade secret, antitrust, and business method patent cases.
Recognized as a Global Leader for three consecutive years (2023-2025) by Intellectual Asset Management’s (IAM) Strategy 300 and as a Next Generation Lawyer by The Legal 500 U.S. for patent litigation, Justin counsels clients on issues of infringement, validity, enforceability, trade secret, antitrust, unfair competition, licensing, due diligence, and IP portfolio management. He has extensive experience advising clients regarding the interplay between patent and regulatory laws, including Orange Book listing of patents for drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Justin regularly speaks on the protection of U.S. intellectual property rights. He has also successfully represented a variety of low-income clients on a pro bono basis.
NOTE: No aspect of these rankings has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Further information on methodologies is available via these links.
Successfully represented Bausch & Lomb and Eye Therapies in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation and parallel PTAB challenges concerning an ANDA for generic versions of over-the-counter Lumify® ocular drops. The cases settled favorably for our clients.
3:21-cv-16766, D.N.J., Judges Kirsch, Singh
IPR2022-00146, PTAB, Judges Hulse, New, Pollock
IPR2024-00467, PTAB, Judges Flax, Pollock, Yang
IPR2022-00142, PTAB, Judges Flax, Hulse, New, Pollock
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation v. Shanghai Auzone Biological Technology Co., Ltd et al.
Representing Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma in litigation matters related to Radicava ORS (edaravone) used to treat patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
2:25-cv-03326, D.N.J., Judge Cecchi
1:23-cv-00759, D. Del., Judges Burke, Connolly, Hall
1:24-cv-01423, D. Del., Judge Hall
1:24-cv-00549, D. Del., Judge Hall
Arvinas Operations, Inc. et al. v. Qian et al.
Defending Accutar Biotechnology, Inc. in a trade secret lawsuit brought by Arvinas regarding alleged trade secrets concerning breast cancer therapies.
3:22-cv-00717, D. Conn., Judges Chatigny, Richardson
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC
2:20-cv-02766, W.D. Tenn., Judge McCalla
22-1222, Fed. Cir., Judges Cunningham, Hughes, Reyna
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Wockhardt Ltd.
1:08-cv-01547, S.D. Ind., Judges Baker, Lawrence, Pratt
Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int’l, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
Finnegan represented Bausch Health Companies (f/k/a Valeant), Salix and Progenics—the innovators and patent owner—in this Hatch-Waxman infringement action in the District of New Jersey. A bench trial was held, and the presiding judge issued an 83-page opinion upholding the validity of the asserted patent claims and finding those claims infringed, thereby entering judgment in favor of the plaintiffs through the life of the patents covering Relistor® tablets, extending through 2030.
2:16-cv-09038, D.N.J., Judges Chesler, Waldor
Webinar
Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents
March 12, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
What’s Working at the PTAB Now: Strategies for Petitioners and Patent Owners What’s Working at the PTAB Now: Strategies for Petitioners and Patent Owners
March 4, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
Protect Your Innovations: Recent Patent Case Law in the Life Sciences Protect Your Innovations: Recent Patent Case Law in the Life Sciences
February 11, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Recent Pharmaceutical, Chemical, and Biotech Case Law on Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents
February 18, 2025
Webinar
Webinar
Recent Court Decisions in the Life Sciences Recent Court Decisions in the Life Sciences
May 22, 2024
Webinar
At the PTAB Blog
Petitioners Fail on Inherency but Prevail on Obviousness Petitioners Fail on Inherency but Prevail on Obviousness
February 9, 2024
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)Award/Ranking
Seven Finnegan Partners Named to IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders 2026 Seven Finnegan Partners Named to IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders 2026
November 19, 2025
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)Press Release
Federal Circuit Affirms Victory for Finnegan Client Castle Retail Against Hawk Technology Systems Federal Circuit Affirms Victory for Finnegan Client Castle Retail Against Hawk Technology Systems
November 17, 2025
Commentary
Fed. Circ. Clears Fees for Grocer After It Beat Camera IP Suit Fed. Circ. Clears Fees for Grocer After It Beat Camera IP Suit
November 14, 2025
Law360Media Mention
Grocery Chain’s Fee Award Affirmed After Patent Dispute Victory Grocery Chain’s Fee Award Affirmed After Patent Dispute Victory
November 14, 2025
Bloomberg LawAward/Ranking
Seven Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2025 IAM Strategy 300 List Seven Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2025 IAM Strategy 300 List
August 13, 2025
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.